Livestock Research Innovation Corporation
  • About
    • About LRIC
    • Board
    • Staff
    • International Research Advisory Committee
    • Emerging Trends and Opportunities Committee
    • Contact Us
    • LRIC Disclaimer
  • Research
    • Ontario Livestock Priorities
    • Sector Priorities
    • OMAFRA Priorities
    • Ontario Agri-Food Research & Innovation Portal
    • Funding Opportunities
  • Getting Research into Practice
    • Overview
    • Horizon Series- Webinars/White Papers
    • Researcher Profiles
    • Researcher Podcasts
    • Producer Videos
    • Research and Reports
    • Engineering A Better Farm
    • GRIP Roundtable 2023
    • GRIP Roundtable 2024
    • HQP Workshop: Communications
  • Resources
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Reports & Materials
    • Events
    • Past Symposiums
    • Annual Reports
    • Research Report: Forces Impacting Animal Agriculture in Canada
  • Building Networks
    • Early Career Research Award
    • Early Career Mentorship Program
    • Farming Innovation Tours
  • Membership
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Founding Members
    • Partner Members

Trust

CEO Commentary by Mike McMorris

A big part of getting research into practice (GRIP) is successfully moving useful information along a line of people - from researcher to farmer, for example. At the end of the line, the farmer needs to make a decision of whether or not to make a change on their farm. That decision may include a large number of factors including cost, return on investment, time saved, personal preference, etc.

But key to all of the decisions is the trust that the farmer puts in the source of the information. 

At the recent Agricultural Adaptation Council annual meeting, the guest speaker outlined three sources of information: institutional, cognitive and algorithmic.

Institutional includes governments, companies and other organizations. Trust in institutional sources has fallen worldwide, not just in agriculture.

Cognitive refers to personal sources, often including a relay of common experiences. Think of the gathering at Tim Horton’s or a chat at the back of the pickup truck.

Algorithmic is new and growing. It is quite eye opening to consider the number of ways that algorithms are determining the information to which we are exposed. 

Each source has potential goodness and weakness. Just think how good it would be if we could align all three to provide efficient flow of highly trusted information.

Recent Articles

  • Feeding Fish for the Future: How Feed Additives Affect Zebrafish Health

    Researchers at the University of Guelph found that while dietary supplements did not significantly affect zebrafish growth or survival, black soldier fly meal showed promising trends for feed efficiency and gut health.

    Read More
  • Making the Invisible Visible: Using Glo Germ to Study Livestock Biosecurity

    Researchers at the University of Guelph are investigating how Glo Germ can be used to model the spread of infectious agents in sheep and goats. This work aims to enhance understanding of on-farm contamination pathways and strengthen biosecurity practices across the livestock sector.

    Read More
  • Kelsey Spence

    Bridging the gap between research and farming

    Ontario Beef, October 2025: This fall marks the start of the fifth cohort of a unique mentorship program for early career scientists at the University of Guelph to introduce them to Ontario’s livestock industry. 

    Read More
Show All
Login

/ / Unsubscribe / Powered by Seamless™

2026 © Livestock Research Innovation Corporation

Guelph, Ontario info@livestockresearch.ca Kelly - 519 831 1719 or Jean - 519 767 8583